RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00175
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His duty title reflect Weapons Load Crew Member from
5 October 2004 to 9 May 2008 Administratively Corrected.
2. His records reflect that he was awarded or granted an F-
16/Fighter Special Experience Identifier (SEI).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His duty history should indicate that he was an F-16 Weapons
Load Crew member from 5 October 2004 to 9 May 2008. Currently
his records indicate he was a Weapons Load Crew Member at
Sheppard AFB from 5 October 2004 to 1 October 2007 which is
incorrect. Also, his records do not indicate he was awarded or
had been granted an F-16/Fighter SEI. As a 5 skill-level F-
16 Weapons Load Crew member his records should reflect F-
16/Fighter SEI.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of technical sergeant.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPTOS states the duty title has been updated in the system
to reflect the requested changes. However, SEI action is
disapproved. DPTOS states the applicant must provide an AF Form
2096, Classification/OJT Training Action, signed by the
commander to the Military Personnel Section (MPS) to update in
the applicants record.
The complete DPTOS evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 19 September 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within
30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application is timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice with
regard to the F-16/Fighter Special Experience Identifier (SEI).
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging
the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the
existence of an error or injustice. We note that the relief
sought by the applicant to correct his duty title to reflect
Weapons Load Crew Member from 5 October 2004 to 9 May 2008 has
been granted administratively. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis for any relief beyond
that granted administratively.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-00175 in Executive Session on 8 January 2015,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 13 December 2013, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPTOS, dated 5 March 2014, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 September 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03154
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicants request for the award of the SAEMR, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00615
His records be corrected to reflect award of the Special Experience Identifier (SEI) for Stinger Missiles to Security Police Personnel, and the United States Air Force (USAF) Missile Badge. They indicated that the applicant was not eligible for any Navy marksmanship awards, as he was not on active duty with the Navy; he was in the Air Force. Since the applicant was on active duty in the Air Force, he would not be authorized to wear another service’s devices on awards earned while in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05227
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/JA recommends the applicants request be approved and that his re-entry (RE) code be updated once the lost time is removed from his records. At the same time, the applicant requested that his lost time be re-calculated; however, as the commander non-concurred with his request, the lost...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00998
His records must reflect his total service for consideration by the Air Forces Force Shaping Boards (FSB). STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 September 1991. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02866
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was given an assignment to serve as a T-6 Instructor Pilot at Sheppard Air Force Base (AFB), Texas, in April 2010. Upon receiving this assignment he was given an Air Force Personnel Center brief through the Osan Air Base Force Support Squadron (FSS) and Military Personnel Flight (MPF) outbound assignments division. He reported to Sheppard AFB in June 2010 and completed T-6 Pilot Instructor...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | bc-2005-01522
He should be awarded the DFC for his actions on 23 June 1952. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the AmnM is awarded for voluntary risk of life not involving actual combat and the applicant’s actions on 23 June 1952 were previously recognized in the AM he was awarded for numerous operational flights from 8 May 1953 to 23 June 1952. On 14 June 1952, he was awarded...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01605
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPTOS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice in reference to lost time. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for award of the AFCM, indicating...
In support of his contention, the applicant submits a copy of an AF Form 63, Officer Airman Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) Counseling Statement, purported counter signed by a Military Personnel Flight official on 16 December 1996 indicating that he incurred an ADSC of 14 June 1998 as a result of Advanced Flying Training. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03833
_________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAO recommends changing the applicants duty title as Group Commander for the IAAFA, effective 28 Jul 10. DPAO states that at the time the applicant met the SERB his records did not correctly reflect his current duty as Group Commander; however, the applicant provided documentation showing his assumption of command on 28 Jul 10. The DPAO complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPTOS states...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04798
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04798 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). DPSIDR indicates that the Directorate of Personnel Assignments (DPA)...